Uniaxial Fatigue Analysis, using S-N (stress-life) and E-N (strain-life) approaches for predicting the life (number
of loading cycles) of a structure under cyclical loading may be performed by using HyperLife.
Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis, using S-N (stress-life), E-N (strain-life), and Dang Van Criterion (Factor
of Safety) approaches for predicting the life (number of loading cycles) of a structure under cyclical
loading may be performed by using HyperLife.
Experiments show that cracks nucleate and grow on specific planes known as critical
planes. The Critical Plane Approach captures the physical nature of damage in its
damage assessment process. It deals with stresses and strains on
the critical planes.
The Stress-Life Approach for the Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis is similar to Uniaxial Fatigue Analysis. See the S-N
Curve and Cycle Counting sections of Uniaxial Fatigue Analysis for introductory information for Stress-Life approach
in Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis.
Since the applied load is considered non-proportional multiaxial cyclic, HyperLife runs the Jiang-Sehitoglu plasticity model to calculate the total strain and elasto-plastic stress.
The method implemented in OptiStruct is based on a research paper Fatigue Life Prediction of MAG-Welded Thin-Sheet Structures published by M. Fermér, M Andréasson, and B Frodin.
Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis, using S-N (stress-life), E-N (strain-life), and Dang Van Criterion (Factor
of Safety) approaches for predicting the life (number of loading cycles) of a structure under cyclical
loading may be performed by using HyperLife.
Experiments show that cracks nucleate and grow on specific planes known as critical
planes. The Critical Plane Approach captures the physical nature of damage in its
damage assessment process. It deals with stresses and strains on
the critical planes.
Experiments show that cracks nucleate and grow on specific planes
known as critical planes. The Critical Plane Approach
captures the physical nature of damage in its damage
assessment process. It deals with stresses and strains on
the critical planes.
Depending on the material and stress states, the critical planes can be either maximum shear
planes or maximum tensile stress planes.
Therefore, to assess damage from multiaxial loads,
two separate damage models are required. One is
for crack growth due to shear, and the other is
for crack growth due to tension.
Any damage model can be used in the critical plane approach. The damage models require a search
for the most damaging plane. There are two
possible damaging (or failure) modes. One on
planes that are perpendicular to the free surface
which is tensile crack growth. The angle
is the angle that a crack is
observed on the surface relative to the direction. The second
failure system occurs on planes oriented 45
degrees to the surface, which is shear crack
growth. Both in-plane and out-of-plane shear
stresses are considered on this plane.
can take on any value on the
surface. The shear stress is an in-plane shear
stress and causes microcracks to grow along the
surface. The maximum out-of-plane shear, occurs on a plane that
is oriented at 45 degrees from the free surface
and causes microcracks to grow into the
surface.
HyperLife searches for the most damaging plane by 10 degrees of
. On each plane, HyperLife assesses damage using tensile
crack damage model and shear crack damage model.
At the end of a search, OptiStruct reports damage at
the most damaging plane which is a critical
plane.